Assistive Technology Assessment Competencies and Resources
Bureau of Exceptional Education and Student Services,
Florida Department of Education
Documents
Competencies
Benchmarks
Indicators
Resources
Local Resources
Other Resources
Department of Education
Suggest a Resource
Competencies/Benchmarks
Competency 3
: Select and use appropriate measurement tools, strategies, and activities to assess a student’s assistive technology needs.
Benchmark 3.1
: Be knowledgeable about the range of screening and assessment tools.
Indicator 3.1.1
: Describe at least one assessment tool for each area being assessed.
Resources
:
Assessment Tools by Areas of Need for Florida AT Assessment Providers Chart (DOC)
Document
Assistive Technology Outcomes Measurement (ATOMS) project from University of Milwaukee (Website)
http://www.r2d2.uwm.edu/atoms/idata
Assistive Technology Assessment Procedure (PDF)
Document
AT Implementation and Evaluation Plan, Zabala & Korsten (PDF)
Document
Georgia Project for Assistive Technology (Website)
http://www.gpat.org/Resources Main.htm
Functional Evaluation for Assistive Technology by Marshall H. Raskind & Brian R. Bryant. Psycho-Education Services, 5114 Balcones Woods Drive #307-163, Austin, TX 78759
Education Tech Points: A Framework for Assistive Technology Planning
, Chapter 4, pages 11 - 13, Gayl Bowser, Penny Reed, Coalition for Assistive Technology in Oregon (CATO), P.O. Box 431, Winchester, OR 97495, or call 541/440-4791 (Located in your Regional Centers and satellite labs)
Indicator 3.1.2
: Locate appropriate assessment tools.
Resources
:
Georgia Project for Assistive Technology - click on "Resource Chart"(Website)
http://www.gpat.org/
List of AT assessment tools available in your district
Indicator 3.1.3
: Define the assessment process in AT.
Resources
:
Texas Assistive Technology Network (Website)
http://www.texasat.net/
default.aspx?name=trainmod.consideration
Assistive Technology Introduction – AT Guidelines (PDF)
Document
Special Education Service Agency Anchorage, AK (Website)
http://www.sesa.org/pub/ATGuidelines.pdf
An Overview of the Assistive Technology Assessment Process (PDF)
Document
Benchmark 3.2
: Select the appropriate tools based on individual student needs.
Indicator 3.2.1
: Locate assessment tools for a specific need.
Resources
:
Georgia Project for Assistive Technology - Go to home page and click on "Assistive Technology Resource Chart" (Website)
http://www.gpat.org
AT Continuum (PDF)
Document
Indicator 3.2.2
: Identify appropriate assessment tools for measuring specific needs.
Resources
:
University at Buffalo State University of New York School of Public Health and Health Professions (Website)
http://atto.buffalo.edu/registered/
DecisionMaking/atprocess.php
Georgia Project for Assistive Technology - Go to home page and click on "Assistive Technology Resource Chart" (Website)
http://www.gpat.org
Indicator 3.2.3
: Identify the process for determining individual student needs.
Resources
:
University at Buffalo State University of New York School of Public Health and Health Professions (Website)
http://atto.buffalo.edu/registered/
DecisionMaking/atprocess.php
Assistive Technology Introduction – AT Guidelines, pages 2 – 4, (PDF)
Document
Special Education Service Agency Anchorage, AK (Website)
http://www.sesa.org/pub/ATGuidelines.pdf
Indicator 3.2.4
: Use the feature match process to determine individual student needs.
Resources
:
University at Buffalo State University of New York School of Public Health and Health Professions (Website)
http://atto.buffalo.edu/registered/
ATBasics/Foundation/Assessment/sett.php
AAC Feature Match Comparison SETBC, 2005, (PDF)
Document
Benchmark 3.3
: Implement the assessment process.
Indicator 3.3.1
: Administer the appropriate assessment tool.
Resources
:
Special Education Technology - British Columbia (SETBC) Resources (Website)
http://www.setbc.org/
requirements/#top
Making It Work-Section 1: Gathering Revelant Information - SETBC Resource, (PDF)
Document
AT Implementation Form - Remley (PDF)
Document
Education Tech Points: A Framework for Assistive Technology Planning, chapter 6 (Website)
http://www.otap-oregon.org/ Publications/OTAPPublications/ tabid/956/default.aspx
Gayl Bowser, Penny Reed, Coalition for Assistive Technology in Oregon (CATO), P.O. Box 431, Winchester, OR 97495, or call 541/440-4791
AT Implementation and Evaluation Plan Summary, Zabala & Korsen (PDF)
Document
Indicator 3.3.2
: Determine the correct environment to administer the assessment.
Resources
:
SETT Framework - Zabala (PDF)
Document
University at Buffalo State University of New York School of Public Health and Health Professions (Website)
http://atto.buffalo.edu/registered/
ATBasics/Foundation/Assessment/sett.php
Indicator 3.3.3
: Administer assessment tools in a customary environment.
Resources
:
District policies and procedures
Quality Indicators for Assistive Technology Services (QIAT), Revised 2005,UPDATED 2007, Assessment of AT Need - Indicator 3 (PDF)
Document
Indicator 3.3.4
: Collect data during the assessment process
Resources
:
University at Buffalo State University of New York School of Public Health and Health Professions (Website)
http://atto.buffalo.edu/registered/
DecisionMaking/resourceRoom_basics.php
Quality Indicators for Assistive Technology Services (QIAT), Revised 2005,UPDATED 2007, Assessment of AT Need - Indicator 5 (PDF)
Document
Indicator 3.3.5
: Summarize findings and make recommendations
Resources
:
Quality Indicators for Assistive Technology Services (QIAT), Revised 2005,UPDATED 2007, Assessment of AT Need - Indicator 6 (PDF)
Document
Functional Evaluation for Assistive Technology (FEAT), Marshall H. Raskind and Brian R. Bryant. Psycho-Education Services, 5114 Balcones Woods Drive #307-163, Austin, TX 78759
Indicator 3.3.6
: Explain how data is used to determine the outcome of an equipment trial.
Resources
:
System Trial Form (PDF)
Document
"Who Gets What and Why? Measuring Outcomes of Assistive Technology Trials" (PDF)
Document